Super Mario president: God, not Supreme Court, has 'final authority'- Two Headlines June 17, from Google News, automatically combining the subject of one headline with the action of another. The bot’s followers really dig the mid-century modern product designs whenever those pop up.” I always love the Russian avant garde typography. The range of the MoMA collection covers a wide swath of the 19 th and 20 th century, so it makes for a nice surprise. The bot was inspired by Darius Kazemi’s which does the same for objects in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. John Emerson ( : “The bot tweets images of random objects from the Museum of Modern Art collection four times a day. It’s one of many museum-collection bots Emerson has made based on Darius Kazemi’s original by: John Emerson ![]() It just impresses me so much.”īeocenter 7000 Radio-Turntable-Cassette Combination, 1979 /P86pNFs5y2- MoMA Bot November 1, images from MoMA’s vast digital archive. But to know that they are being posted by a bot with no human intervention - I find it amazing that the creators found a way to capture this aesthetic so precisely with an algorithm. And the moths themselves are beautiful on their own. Every single moth it generates is utterly beautiful and completely unique … its entire aesthetic feels so perfect to me. And if you were to tweet a tiny variation of your name - perhaps you add a middle initial - it would also alter slightly, maybe the pattern on the wings would shift, or it would be a paler is astounding to me. For example, if you were to tweet your name at it, it would reply with a moth unique to your name and unlike any other moth that it had ever made. The language is translated into a number, on which all of the moth components are based. When someone tweets the bot uses the text of that tweet to seed the drawing. I’m proud of the project in general, but the reason it is my favorite is because it is my first bot that uses the functionality of Twitter in a constructive way. Instead it is an extremely complicated drawing routine that runs in Javascript, but we ended up using Twitter as a publishing platform. Katie Rose Pipkin ( “The bulk of this bot has nothing to do with Twitter. Gaecasiophora piniana /7r2Xyetw2D- moth generator September 1, Javascript to produce striking renderings of imaginary moths, and then tweets them with faux-scientific names to breathe life into them.Ĭreated by: Katie Rose Pipkin and Loren Schmidt ![]() So we spoke to some of our favorite bot-makers about their favorite Twitter bots - their own, and made by others in the #botALLY community - to surface some lesser-known projects worth following. But there are so many other creative and useful bots out there that don’t get the attention they deserve. That combination of formal restriction and frictionlessness has led to the rise of a bot that mashes up results for Twitter searches for adverbs like literally and truly to create tweets so convincing - and sometimes profound - that Twitter users interact with her as if she’s a real teenage girl, and a linguistic experiment (2007-2014) composed of individual tweets of every single word in the English language. Retweeting, faving, lists - all the basic functionalities that we take for granted are really great for bots.” “There’s not a hard expectation on Tumblr of what a Tumblr post should look like and how it should be composed, whereas it’s pretty codified about how to write a tweet. “It’s easier to fill 140 characters with something interesting than, like, a Tumblr post, which could be thousands and thousands of words,” he explains. Why Twitter? Its 140-character constraint is perfect for bot-making, says Darius Kazemi, a prolific bot-maker (he’s made something like 50 Twitter bots, and many more on other social-media platforms) and organizer of Bot Summit. In the last few years, artists and programmers have turned Twitter bots into an internet-native art form, producing bots that are often hilarious, usually weird, and sometimes unexpectedly poetic. Some recontextualize words ( or images ( while others leverage Twitter’s flexibility to produce commentary ( journalism ( or generative art ( sparking amusing or illuminating juxtapositions in your timeline. Bots can be the absolute worst part of Twitter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |